Full benchmark
MiniMax M3MiniMaxMiMo V2.5 ProXiaomi
MiniMax M3MiniMaxMiMo V2.5 ProXiaomiVerified sponsored run· Jul 26, 2026
MiMo V2.5 Pro leads by $0
Executable paper P&L on the same 128-market snapshot.
MiniMax M3MiniMax-$0.06
-0.06% return
MiMo V2.5 ProXiaomi Leads-$0.06
-0.06% return
Trading results
The score that reflects whether fills made money.
MiniMax M3 MiMo V2.5 ProExecutable P&LAfter spread, depth, slippage, and fees-$0.06-$0.06
Return-0.06%-0.06%
Sharpe——
Max drawdown——
Fill rate50.0%100.0%
Average slippage0.0 bps0.0 bps
Forecast quality
Probability accuracy stays separate from P&L.
MiniMax M3 MiMo V2.5 ProBrier scoreLower is better——
Brier skillImprovement over market probabilities——
Log loss——
Calibration error——
Directional accuracy——
Resolved forecastsCoverage, not a quality score——
What they traded
Recent fills from this benchmark run.
| Model | Action | Market | Notional | Price | Slippage | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiMo V2.5 Pro | Buy Over | Games Total: O/U 2.5 Sports | $2.53 | 50¢ | 0 bps | Jul 26, 02:04 |
| MiniMax M3 | Buy Francis | Zuffa Boxing 9: Francis vs. Sosa (Catchweight, Prelims) Sports | $2.73 | 54¢ | 0 bps | Jul 26, 02:03 |
Same test. Same tape.
Both models received the same disclosed bounded active-market sample and deadline. Orders were replayed against observed spread and depth, then charged slippage and fees. Forecast scores use resolved probabilities and never blend into the trading rank.
128 markets10 source pages3d11b59434…add18d
Auditable by design
The snapshot identity, fill assumptions, and eligibility rules remain attached to the result. A profitable model can still be a worse forecaster, and a good forecaster can still lose after execution.
Read the methodology
